@Atty-JP-Chua said in What’s your “lucky charm” for exams?:
fdaffdfdsafdafd
qeqcasld fjla df
fasld fjlka;sdf
@Atty-JP-Chua said in What’s your “lucky charm” for exams?:
fdaffdfdsafdafd
qeqcasld fjla df
fasld fjlka;sdf
We all have them
— some wear the same shirt, some bring a rosary, others eat a certain meal before big exams.
What’s your exam‑day ritual or lucky charm that keeps you calm and confident? 
️
Hey everyone! 
I’m looking to join (or form) a small online study group for Bar prep. Maybe 3–5 people max so we can quiz each other and share notes.
If you’re interested, reply here or DM me.
Studying day and night can be overwhelming
.
What’s your go‑to routine (or guilty pleasure) to manage stress during review season?
Share your best tips — from power naps, playlists, or even comfort food hacks 
.
Question:
How long can probation be granted in the Philippines under Presidential Decree No. 968, as amended? Are there differences depending on the gravity of the offense?
Expected Answer:
We’d appreciate clarification on the maximum period and any exceptions recognized in jurisprudence.
Question:
Under what circumstances can a minor be held criminally liable in the Philippines, given the provisions of the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act (R.A. 9344, as amended)?
Expected Answer:
Legal professionals, please clarify the age of exemption from criminal liability and whether intervention programs apply.
Oposa v. Factoran is a landmark environmental case where minors, through their parents, sued to cancel timber licenses, invoking their constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology.
Significance:
Recognized the doctrine of intergenerational responsibility.
Expanded the scope of constitutional rights to environmental protection.
️ Discussion Prompt:
Do you believe the principle of intergenerational responsibility is effectively enforced today, or is it more symbolic than practical?
In Ang Tibay v. Court of Industrial Relations, the Supreme Court laid down the “cardinal primary rights” in administrative due process, ensuring fairness even outside judicial trials.
Key Points:
Right to a hearing
Consideration of the evidence presented
Decision supported by evidence
Decision rendered based on the record
The tribunal must act on its own independent consideration
The decision must be rendered in such a manner that the parties can know the issues involved
The tribunal must render its decision on the evidence presented at the hearing
️ Discussion Prompt:
In what ways has Ang Tibay influenced modern labor law and administrative cases in the Philippines?
In People v. Genosa, the Supreme Court recognized Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) as a form of self-defense under Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code.
Facts:
Marivic Genosa killed her husband after enduring years of domestic abuse. The Court considered her actions within the context of BWS.
️ Issue:
Can Battered Woman Syndrome justify killing an abusive spouse as self-defense?
Ruling:
The Court affirmed that BWS may qualify as self-defense, but only if the elements of unlawful aggression, reasonable necessity of the means employed, and lack of sufficient provocation are proven.
Discussion Prompt:
Do you agree that the recognition of Battered Woman Syndrome sufficiently addresses the limitations of traditional self-defense under the Revised Penal Code?
Feel free to share your analysis — especially on how this precedent impacts subsequent cases involving domestic violence.
This is what a topic and post looks like. As an administrator, you can edit the post's title and content.
To customise your forum, go to the Administrator Control Panel. You can modify all aspects of your forum there, including installation of third-party plugins.